Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey

Translate this post

As part of the Wikimedia Movement strategic plan, regular surveys among Wikipedia editors are an important way to take the pulse of the community and identify pressing concerns and needs. We are happy to share results from the second editor survey that was conducted in December 2011. We began survey efforts in April 2011, and results from the first survey are available here. We would like to point out that although this blog post and the following ones will be looking at some trends across the April and December survey, 7-8 months is a rather short time to see statistically significant change on important indicators like gender distribution resulting from Wikimedia Foundation initiatives. Here are some demographic data about Wikipedia editors:

a. Wikipedia editors continue to be predominantly men

The gender distribution of Wikipedia editors hasn’t changed since the last survey. Among those surveyed, 90 percent self-identified as males, 9 percent as females and 1 percent as transsexual or transgender. That being said, there was a greater amount of female editors among those respondents who had joined more recently: Among editors who had joined in 2011, 14 percent were female compared to 10 percent for 2010, 9 percent for 2009 and 8 percent for editors who had joined in 2008 and participated in this survey. Possible explanations include that Wikipedia has been attracting a higher ratio of women recently, or that female editors leave the project sooner. There were no significant variations across the major language Wikipedias, with the exception of the Russian Wikipedia, which reported only 6 percent female editors. Also, out of all editors in the US, 15 percent are women, which is significantly higher than any other country of residence. Conversely, there are fewer male editors in US (85 percent) compared to other countries (UK, India, Brazil, Canada) where 90 percent or more of editors are males.  With initiatives like the Teahouse project that engages new editors through outreach, we hope to increase the number of female editors on Wikipedia.

(D15) What is your gender? (n=6503)

D15. What is your gender? n=6503

b. English Wikipedia continues to be the most read and edited Wikipedia

As we had found in the April 2011 survey, a large majority of Wikipedia editors read and edit the English version. Many editors that primarily make edits to another language Wikipedia also edit the English Wikipedia. While only 30 percent primarily edit the English Wikipedia, 63 percent contribute to it. Almost half of English Wikipedia editors reported other language Wikipedias as their primary project. Similarly, 86 percent of Wikipedia editors read the English Wikipedia, though only 38 percent read it primarily.

Q1a. Which language versions of Wikipedia do you CONTRIBUTE to? Please choose all that apply.

Q1b. Which language version of Wikipedia do you PRIMARILY CONTRIBUTE to? Please choose ONE.

Q2a. Which language versions of Wikipedia do you READ? Please choose all that apply.

Q2b. Which language version of Wikipedia do you PRIMARILY READ? Please choose ONE.

If you are interested learning more about Wikipedia editors – from age demographics to their editing experiences, please check out this space as we publish the long-awaited topline findings from the survey.
Mani Pande, Head of Global Development Research
Ayush Khanna, Data Analyst, Global Development
In December 2011, we conducted an online survey of Wikipedia editors in 17 languages. This is the first in a series of blog posts summarizing our findings. If you are interested, you can find out more about the methodology of the survey here.

Archive notice: This is an archived post from blog.wikimedia.org, which operated under different editorial and content guidelines than Diff.

Can you help us translate this article?

In order for this article to reach as many people as possible we would like your help. Can you translate this article to get the message out?

24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

In Russia we want to know more to understand what is happening. Can I get a letter for more details, in particular, the sample size of Russia?

This is a very high rate of gender imbalance. Wikipedia needs to be proactive in addressing this gender imbalance.

[…] only encouraging part about the second editors survey is that, according to Wikipedia’s blog entry about the results, 14% of new editors in 2011 were women, compared to 10% for 2010, 9% for 2009, and 8% for […]

[…] Out of Ten Wikipedians Continue to Be Men Filed by Gary Price on April 30, 2012 at 2:48 pm From a Wikimedia Post: The gender distribution of Wikipedia editors hasn’t changed since the last survey [April 2011]. […]

At what level are the statistics on the gender distribution significant? E.g. in “gender distribution across countries”, are the differences e.g. between Brazil (7%) and UK (9%) or US (14%) statistically significant, or are they within the uncertainties of the survey?
(The same applies to comparisons with this and previous surveys – I’ve heard people say that the gender balance used to be 13% in the first survey, then decreased to 9% in the second survey, indicating that it was getting worse – but I suspect the uncertainty here’s about 4% or so, i.e. consistent answers…)

Thanks Mike, Great points. Here is some more information that you might find to be useful. There is a statistically significant difference between US and every other country shown in the bar graph. UK, Germany, MENA and Canada are not statistically significant from each other, but there is a statistically significant difference between them and India. This survey (December 2011) and April 2011 have the same methodology i.e we screened out for those who don’t edit Wikipedia, but the UNU-Merit study included readers who tend to be more women. I would explain the difference in gender to methodology rather than… Read more »

[…] using either directly or indirectly, and it is shaping the world.  Anyone can edit Wikipedia, but Wikipedia editors consist of almost entirely men with an estimate of only around  13% being women.  This is the first time in all of human history […]

[…] only encouraging part about the second editors survey is that, according to Wikipedia’s blog entry about the results, 14% of new editors in 2011 were women, compared to 10% for 2010, 9% for 2009, and 8% for […]

[…] blijf me er keer op keer over verbazen: 90% van de wikipedians is een man. De tijd dat computers een mannending was zijn we toch al lang voorbij? Wie heeft hier een goede […]

[…] encourage more South Asian women to use this opportunity because right now 9 out of 10 Wikipedians are men. There are many subjects that may be of interest or value to women that are not covered in […]

[…] ** I don’t know for sure that this person is a man. But in seems likely, in part given that nine out of ten Wikipedia editors are men. […]

[…] Խմբագիրների սեռային կազմը ըստ մի քանի երկրներում (պատկերը Վիքիմեդիա Հիմնադրամից բլոգից) […]

Many thanks for making the effort in order to compose this really helpful update. Although the gender mix seems imbalanced, the methodology seems quite logical.

[…] about to work with and explore. Our group had many more women and a much lower average age than Wikipedia commonly has. This shaped the interests and perspectives we wanted to add to articles or write about. We wrote […]

[…] Խմբագիրների սեռային կազմը մի քանի երկրներում (պատկերը Վիքիմեդիա Հիմնադրամից բլոգից) […]

[…] the democratic encyclopedia edited by anyone. Still, most editors are men; in 2012, an astounding 90 percent, according to the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia. Those are numbers Stacey is trying to […]

[…] survey by Wikimedia, Wikipedia’s parent organization, found that about 90% of its volunteers were men. “Its entries on Pokemon and female porn stars are comprehensive, but its pages on female […]

[…] You probably also know that Wikipedia also has a huge ‘gender’ problem. According to a study conducted by Wikipedia in 2011, only 9% of the editors at Wikipedia were women. India fares even […]

[…] and popularity of Wikipedia. However, what most people don’t know is that, according to a study conducted in 2011, only 9% of the editors at Wikipedia were women. And the percentage for India is […]

[…] reach and popularity of Wikipedia. However, what most people don’t know is that, according to a study conducted in 2011, only 9% of the editors at Wikipedia were women. And the percentage for India is […]

[…] reach and popularity of Wikipedia. However, what most people don’t know is that, according to a study conducted in 2011, only 9% of the editors at Wikipedia were women. And the percentage for India is […]

[…] reach and popularity of Wikipedia. However, what most people don’t know is that, according to a study conducted in 2011, only 9% of the editors at Wikipedia were women. And the percentage for India is […]

[…] sorry situation is partially the result of Wikipedia’s own infamous gender gap: In 2012, a survey conducted by the website revealed that only 9% of its editors around the world were women; in India, the figure was even […]