New Reports from November 2008 Survey Released

Translate this post

In November 2008, the Collaborative Creativity Group at UNU-Merit, in partnership with the Wikimedia Foundation, launched the most comprehensive survey of Wikipedia readers and contributors ever conducted. The survey was translated into 20 languages and received more than 170,000 responses. In April 2009, we shared preliminary results of the survey, and in August 2009, a member of the UNU-Merit team presented the survey at Wikimania (slides are available online).

Some key results from the survey have been widely reported, such as the finding that only about 13% of all Wikipedia contributors are female, a gender imbalance that poses a serious challenge to the Wikipedia project. The UNU-Merit group has now published four final reports:
The UNU-Merit team is planning to make a comprehensive final report report available very soon, and to release the full, anonymized raw data later this year.
Erik Moeller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation

Archive notice: This is an archived post from blog.wikimedia.org, which operated under different editorial and content guidelines than Diff.

Can you help us translate this article?

In order for this article to reach as many people as possible we would like your help. Can you translate this article to get the message out?

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Only 13% female 😮 That’s a surprisingly big imbalance. Very interesting stats 🙂

[…] From a Blog Post: In November 2008, the Collaborative Creativity Group at UNU-Merit, in partnership with the Wikimedia Foundation, launched the most comprehensive survey of Wikipedia readers and contributors ever conducted. The survey was translated into 20 languages and received more than 170,000 responses. […]

[…] en undersøkelse (og her) av Wikipedias brukere og bidragsytere, utført av en gruppe forskere ved United Nations University […]

A very interesting post. An huge research effort is focused in editors, but nothing is said about readers. Thanks.

I’ve found a ton of inconsistencies in these UNU data. Unfortunate.