Article Feedback Pilot: Edit this Feature!

Translate this post

As recently announced on this blog and in the Signpost, we’re planning to roll out a new experimental tool to capture article feedback from readers, as part of the Public Policy Initiative. It will be an opportunity for the user community to directly participate in the assessment and development of the feature if the test proves successful.
The “Article Feedback Tool” will allow any reader of an article to quickly and easily assess the sourcing, completeness, neutrality, and readability of a Wikipedia article on a five-point scale. In addition to being a way to measure article quality for the Public Policy Initiative, we hope the Article Feedback Tool could be a way to increase reader engagement by seeking feedback from readers on how they view the article. The tool should also give editors an easy way to see where an article needs improvement.
Improving article quality has long been a major topic for the Wikimedia community. However, scalable and reliable tools are few and far between to address this issue. The Public Policy Initiative provides a useful framework to run a pilot for quality assessment of articles. The goal of the project is to improve the quality of public policy-related articles. Comparing standard community self-assessment processes, opinion sought from external experts, and article feedback from readers (with the test tool) will help to provide the community with a better understanding of the strengths and limits of each system.
We hope that the Public Policy project will provide us with feedback that will help in the future development of the feature. From this perspective, the goal of this pilot is to provide the community with a “draft” version of the tool. We want to make deeper efforts to include the community of users in helping build new features, so we hope to assess this “draft” together and “edit it” for improvements. If the test tool is considered useful, the Wikimedia Foundation will allocate resources to improve it with your help and build a stable feature from it. In general, the pilot of this tool also reflects a shift in the Wikimedia Foundation’s development processes toward more systematic and iterative experimentation and trials with new technology, in collaboration with the community and other stakeholders. In the future, we plan to formalize this approach with an official “Wikimedia Labs” entity.
We’re still trying to figure out how to best accomplish this collaboration between makers and users of this tool. For now, we’re considering a “task force” (similar to those used in the Strategy project) comprised of users interested in assessing the feature’s strengths and weaknesses, working together with developers and designers. We’re open to other suggestions.
The experimental feature is planned for deployment on September 22 on a handful of pages with limited visibility. We will give you another update at launch. In the meantime, you’re warmly invited to look at the preliminary design and join the workgroup to participate in the evaluation of the tool.
— Alolita Sharma
Features Engineering Program Manager, Wikimedia Foundation

Archive notice: This is an archived post from, which operated under different editorial and content guidelines than Diff.

Can you help us translate this article?

In order for this article to reach as many people as possible we would like your help. Can you translate this article to get the message out?

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I hope “Wikimedia Labs” will become an official Wikimedia entity as soon as possible. Because the ignorance of readers’ and editors’ voices on project development (Bugzilla has tons of important bugs sitting there for years) that the Foundation shows is alarming…

The experimental feature is planned for deployment on September 22 on a handful of pages with limited visibility.
I assume it will be on enwiki ?

Darkoneko, yes, this pilot is on en-wiki. Specifically, on articles within WikiProject United States Public Policy.

Does this mean that a mediawiki extension will be released as well ?

Olivier :

Does this mean that a mediawiki extension will be released as well ?

It’s already in SVN, although it’s still under development.

This is a very good idea, and very close to some of the transparency principles we have been advocating for some time on

An excellent initiative from wikimedia labs. I think the game is the most sensitive issue and one that may be the most improved. Wikipedia has to solve some problems due to its enormous popularity. Hopefully this new tool can help in any case good luck!

For general production, I think that the category check be lifted.
A thought.

Eh, you know better Facebook, than Wikimedia. We don’t want it.

Can I point out I came up with this five years ago and spent quite some time trying to push it through, ultimately stymied by refusal to add an article rating feature to the live code?
Of course, it was for an entirely different purpose … but gah!

Andrew Steinborn :
For general production, I think that the category check be lifted.
A thought.

My understanding is that this will be explored in the future, yes. However, it’s not clear that this is desirable, or if the servers can handle it.