US Education Program participants add three times as much quality content as regular new users

Wikipedia Education Program participants from the United States added more than three times as much quality content as regular new users, a quantitative analysis shows.
In the Wikipedia Education Program, professors assign their students to edit Wikipedia articles as a grade for class, assisted by volunteer Wikipedia Ambassadors. In fall 2011, 55 courses participated in the program in the United States, with students editing articles on the English Wikipedia. On average, these students added 1855 bytes of content that stayed on Wikipedia, compared to only 491 for a randomly chosen sample of new users who joined English Wikipedia in September 2011. These numbers establish that students who participate in the Wikipedia Education Program contribute significantly more quality content that stays on Wikipedia than other new users.
Examining the distribution of content that survived on Wikipedia for both of these groups, we found that almost half of the Wikipedia Education Program participants added 1,000 or more bytes that stayed on Wikipedia in the first six months. In contrast, more than half of the random sample of new editors added no content that stayed on Wikipedia in the first six months. The targeted recruitment of students, combined with the support provided by the Ambassador Program and instructors, results in a much larger percentage of new editors who contribute quality content to Wikipedia.

To understand the collective impact of the Wikipedia Education Program in fall 2011, we compared the amount of content students added to Wikipedia to the content added by the random sample of new editors. The numbers show that the 920 student editors who participated in the program in fall 2011 added the same amount of content as 2250 typical new editors (editors are defined as users who made at least one edit to an article). In terms of new content, students have twice the impact as typical new editors.
An important consideration for any outreach project is editor retention. Data showed that students who are introduced to editing Wikipedia through the U.S. Education Program are just as likely to continue editing as any other newcomer.
The Wikipedia Education Program has now grown to Egypt, Brazil and other regions beyond North America. With an increased global presence, measuring and understanding the contributions of new student editors (and how they differ from other new users that join Wikipedia) has gained importance. Establishing a common metric for measuring the impact of the Wikipedia Education Program on various Wikipedias is another key motivation for a quantitative study.
There’s a lot more work to be done on measuring the program’s impact. So, stay tuned for more information about these metrics.
Methodology for this research can be found at: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Education_Program_evaluation#Methods
Ayush Khanna, Data Analyst, Global Development
(with input from Mani Pande, Head of Global Development Research)

Archive notice: This is an archived post from blog.wikimedia.org, which operated under different editorial and content guidelines than Diff.

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

[…] US Education Program participants add three times as much quality content as regular new users (wikimedia.org) 37.979180 23.716647 Rate this: Μοιραστείτε το :FacebookTwitterPinterestEmailDiggLinkedInRedditStumbleUponPrintTumblrLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]

[…] US Education Program participants add three times as much quality content as regular new users (wikimedia.org) 37.979180 23.716647 Rate this: Μοιραστείτε το :FacebookTwitterPinterestEmailDiggLinkedInRedditStumbleUponPrintTumblrLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. This entry was posted in Διαδίκτυο and tagged Battle of Fort Sumter, Editing, Encyclopedia, Justin Knapp, Open Content, Open source, Wikipedia, Woody Guthrie. Bookmark the permalink. ← Big “Black Box” Brother σε όλα τα αυτοκίνητα στις ΗΠΑ από το 2015 […]

[…] et Meta : le programme pour l’éducation de Wikipédia donnerait de bons résultats (lien) ■ Le 20 Avril est maintenant le Justin Knapp Day, du nom d’un contributeur qui a […]

“Data showed that students who are introduced to editing Wikipedia through the U.S. Education Program are just as likely to continue editing as any other newcomer.” Slightly disappointing, I would say 🙁

A couple of comments: 1)Just because more bytes of students text stay on Wikipedia than bytes of a random new user does not necessarily mean that they contribute more quality content. It might mean that they are editing less closely watched pages and thus concerning edits are less frequently picked and reverted up by the community. *Do not mean to be the devils advocate but the only way to determine if the text is of good quality is to manually go over every change that is made by students and every change that is made by a group of random… Read more »

[…] internationale Wikipedia Educatie Programma werpt vruchten af. Wikimedia maakte vorige week bekend dat deelnemers aan dit programma drie keer zo veel kwaliteitsbijdragen op Wikipedia plaatsen dan […]

Thanks for the comments. @Harry: The goal of the program is to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles. That said, we are working towards increasing retention of students after the academic semester ends. @James: Re 1: A quantitative approach is definitely not the complete picture, but we feel it is a very good approximation. Qualitative research will be more accurate, but also requires a considerably greater amount of effort. That said, we are working with a few community members on defining qualitative metrics for evaluating the program. Please join the discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard#Suggested_approach_to_metrics_for_student-edited_articles if you are interested. Re 2: See… Read more »